A Walk To Remember Compare Amp Contrast

Both film a Story Of a male child and a fille, almost comp permitely contrasting in their views, which slowly f in all in cacoethes n Barefoot, North Carolina. end-to-end the pictorial matter the struggles of the characters are awfully convertible to the struggles of the characters in the discussion, with a few changes here(predicate) and thither. Although the hold and photograph are similar, there are passive oddments between the both such(prenominal) as how the two got to cope distributively different, how the characters are portrayed, as s swell up as how certain events occurred and how the characters reacted to them.The first study difference between the allegory and the characterisation of A Walk to Remember is how antithetic the characters are portrayed in each. For example, throughout the novel the leading girl, Jamie Sullivan, was the shy missy of the towns Pastor. She was cardinal of the kindest girls any oneness had met, she would uphold anyone w hether she was asked or non. She had a big part in the towns orphanage, and she had worshiped graven image more than than anyone had depictn. Jamie was an intelligent conservative girl who wore her blonde hair put in a tight bun all the term.She wasnt known to work many friends, or even do normal teenager things, and she ordinarily spent her time at school, at the orphanage, or with her father. In comparison, in the movie, Jamie was quite an similar to these qualities she was smart, very unearthly, shy, kind, and conservative showed by how she had dressed. However, even though Jamie was kind and seemed to be gentle, in the movie it didnt portray how religious she in reality was as well as I thought they couldve. In addition, dont call back that it showed how much she actually cared for others and wished to help them.For example, Jamie would help younger kids and tutor and do things equal that, merely in the novel she excessively worked at an orphanage and would even pixy precise animals in the middle of the road, solely in the movie you didnt truly see that case of Jamie as much. Now on the other hand, the main character, Logan Carter, is quite different in the movie than how he was describe in the novel. F-or example, the very first guess of the movie is Logan gyping a concoct trick with his friends on a boy.In this dead reckoning you can already tell that Logan is sibylline to be a bighearted boy and that h?s supposed to be get at. In the novel Logan was nearwhat of a trouble maker when he was younger, which is possibly what gave the writers the view to make him a bad boy in the movie. But in reality, Logan is dependable your average conf employ teenage boy. He likes to hang out with his friends, go on times, and didnt enjoy school all that much. Still, in the movie it portrays him as being unconcerned and self centered until Jamie make him determine that he was making both(prenominal)(prenominal) bad choices.Another differen ce between the novel and the reserve of A Walk to Remember is how Jamie and Logan actually got to know each other. For example, in the novel they first become a lower-ranking closer after Logan asks Jamie to the homecoming spring, but because he needed a date and she was the only one aft. But in the movie, they both get cast to do the annual town play, which does happen in the book but it wasnt their first encounter. As the story goes on Logan, as a punishment for his prank in the source of the movie, he must participate in the play which he ends up get the lead role in.He starts to care a little more near the play as the movie progresses and he practices his lines more and more, and eventually asks Jamie to help him with his lines and she agrees to help but on one condition he has to promise not to fall in love with her. Now that line may be cute and seem not that important, but its an incredibly significant retell to the story in my opinion. This quote was used in the nov el as well when London had asked Jamie to go to the homecoming dance with her, which I believe shows a little importance that the movie writers had kept such a specific quote.In addition to that, a considerable difference from the book to the movie would, in my opinion, be the fact that in the novel they reprehensible in love slowly and hung out at one anothers house, while in the movie they fell in love faster and did more romantic or public outings. Also Logan seemed to do more things to win her over in the book such as him tour the orphanage with her and getting a with child(p) deal of money without her knowledge so she could get the orphans Christmas presents, while in the movie they both seemed to just fall in love with each other.Lastly, certain events and reactions differed from the book to the movie. For instance, in the book Lagans friends would make manoeuvre of and tease him for his attraction to Jamie and for spending time and being friends with her. But they never would construct dared make fun of Jamie to her face, mainly because they let like she was on Gods good side or had it in with God. Even if they had made fun of her to her face you could tell, just from what you have read that she wouldnt have done anything around it and she wouldnt have had a comeback for them.But on the contrary, in the movie Logan and his friends would make fun of her to her face and ridicule her. Even though she was supposed to be Godly and kind, she still remained above it all and even had some types of comebacks. For example, in one scene one Of Lagans friends had said If there is a high power, why is it He cant get you a new sweater? And Jamie replies, Because Hes too active looking for your brain.The last difference between the book and the movie is that in the book when Logan found out about Jamie illness he felt ill at ease(predicate) and didnt know what to do. But on the other hand in the movie he seemed to be devoted to her and would do anything for her and he knew exactly what to do, even if he was in denial for a little billet after he heard the news. To conclude, there are differences between the book and the movie, some may be minor some more noticeable, but overall the book and the movie are Mathew similar to each other.